Did They Just Throw Mama From The
Train?
By Nancy R. Larson, Attorney
It
just got harder to be old. In response
to tightening the Federal budget and a promise by Congress last year to slash
$10 billion from the Federal Medicaid budget, President Bush signed the new
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on
Chapter 2 of the new Deficit Reduction Act dramatically
impacts planning for the golden years.
Medicaid is the Federal government program that provides
benefits to the elderly, poor and disabled.
Medicaid pays for approximately 48% of skilled nursing home care in the
The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
(HFS) is working on a new set of policy rules that
will be provided to the local Illinois Department of Human services (DHS)
offices. DHS is the
Under previous law, when a person applied for Medicaid 36
months of financial records were required to be submitted with an
application. The Deficit Reduction Act
changes the 36 month look back period from 36 months to 60 months. All applicants are now required to provide
five years of financial records. This
will indeed be a recordkeeping challenge for the elderly and their families.
If the Medicaid applicant transfers assets (by gift or
trust) within five years of applying for Medicaid, those assets will be treated
as if they wee still owned by the applicant in determining eligibility for
Medicaid. All transactions within the
look back period must be documented and explained to the DHS. Transfers for less than fair market value
that are made within the look back period create a period of Medicaid
ineligibility.
Under the old law, the ineligibility period began on the
date the applicant transferred an asset (i.e. made a gift). In other words, a $10,000.00 gift made a year
ago would create about a two month period of ineligibility for Medicaid. That period of ineligibility started on the
date the gift was made. The person would
be ineligible for Medicaid for two months following the date of the gift, which
was 12 months ago. The period of ineligibility
would have expired 10 months ago, and the gift would not affect other Medicaid
applications.
The new ineligibility period begins on the date the
person applies for Medicaid and (1) is in a skilled nursing facility and (2)
whose application for Medicaid would be approved but for the imposition of a
penalty period.
The outcome will be harsher under the Deficit Reduction
Act provisions. Seniors may be
ineligible for Medicaid even though they have spent down all of their assets
private paying for their long term care.
Under the Deficit Reduction Act, any gifts over a five
year period are aggregated into a single penalty period no matter how small the
gift. In other words, gifts to churches,
grandchild, or charities made with no intention of qualifying for Medicaid will
result in a DHS caseworker imposing a period of ineligibility for Medicaid.
Consider the father who gave $30,000.00 to his daughter
four years ago for the down payment on a house.
Under pre-Deficit Reduction Act, that transfer would create a penalty
period of about six months that would start on the first day of the month in
which the transfer was made. His
ineligibility would have expired four months after making the gift, and he
would be approved for Medicaid.
Under the new Deficit Reduction Act, the $30,000.00 gift
four years ago would result in denial of Medicaid eligibility. Dad would apply for Medicaid, and it would be
determined that but for the gift made four years ago, he would be
eligible. But the six month period of
ineligibility starts when he would otherwise be eligible and is receiving
skilled nursing care. Dad is already in
the nursing home and now faces a six month period of ineligibility. With all of his assets gone, he is deemed
Medicare.
What will the nursing home do with a non-paying patient,
who has no assets and will not qualify for Medicaid for six months? The Deficit Reduction Act may become known as
the “Nursing Home Bankruptcy Act of 2005”.
A hardship waiver exception may be of some assistance; however,
the DHS must set the policy for determining the applicability of the hardship
waiver exception. In the past, hardship
waivers were nearly impossible to qualify for as it was triggered if the
Medicaid applicant is in danger of loss of health or life or of “food,
clothing, shelter, or other necessities of life”. Federal law prohibits nursing homes from
evicting a non-paying resident unless another institution will take the person. If a facility cannot evict a non-paying
resident without providing alternative care and no alternative care exists, is
there really a hardship to the resident in shifting the burden of uncompensated
care from the government to the nursing home indirectly which may change the
way nursing homes do business.
Under the new law, equity in homes of nursing home
residents exceeding $500,000.00 will be considered an “available resource” and
must be liquidated to pay toward cost of care.
States may elect to revise this amount to $750,000.00. The house will not be counted as an asset if
the nursing home resident’s spouse, child under 21 years of age, or disabled
child is living in the house.
The new law provides that the Medicaid applicant must
disclose any interest the individual and spouse have in annuities. To receive Medicaid benefits the applicant
must list the State of
The annuity must be irreversible, non-assignable, actuarially sound and provide for equal payment during the
term of the annuity. No deferral or
balloon payments are permitted.
This is a preliminary analysis as we wait for the State
of
What now? Seeking
legal counsel has never been more important.
Providing honest ways for seniors to protect their homes, loved ones,
and independence will continue to be a priority.
Nancy
R. Larson is an attorney with offices in